good information
the book is repetitive, but that is Ron's point. Bubbles repeat themselves. And the book is easy to read.
To bad the Ron Insana's show on CNBC during the height of the high tech bubble wasn't so insightful. And who was heckling "qualcom...qualcom...qualcom" in the back ground during a show then?? Or "we should of bought Qualcom at the beginning of the year and closed our doors". My point is Ron the author sure is smarter than Ron the CNBC anchorman.
It was Abby Joseph Colen that called it a bubble on Wallstreet Week on March 10th, and not Ron Insana.
History repeats itself
Mr. Insana wrote this book to inform investors that history does repeat itself over and over again. He is specifically referring to "investment bubbles."
He shows graphically and textually the similarities and causes of many of the great speculative bubbles throughout history. Some of them include: Mississippi, South Sea, real estate, Japan, NASDAQ, etc.
Many "bubbles" are described. They are easy to understand although most don't go into a lot of detail. Mr. Insana quotes many other references to clarify the stages of investment manias.
The book was easy to read and would recommend this book to someone who wants more clarity on investment bubbles and wants general overviews of famous investment crashes throughout history.
Plenty of much better alternatives out there
Not that I want to be a contrarian nor somebody prejudiced against experts or gurus (There were recommendations from Barton Biggs, Robert Shiller and Scott Adams in the backcover), however, as somebody who had read over a hundred trading books including some of the best of its "financial history" kind, including "Devil take the hindmost: A history of financial speculation by Edward Chancellor", "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay" and "Origins of the Crash: The Great Bubble and Its Undoing by Roger Lowenstein", I am obliged to comment that this book is disappointing. Not only the author's writing skill is substandard as reflected by the very jumpy and disorganised style of telling by and large similar stories of financial bubbles in the past, one can hardly tell the key points of individual chapters (and I still cant figure out why they are in such a non-chronological nor theme related arrangement), not to say remember them. Highlighted "Insana Insights" here and there in each chapter are fine, but cant save the book. On the other hand, dont know whether the author wanted to return favor to his guests or to keep himself politically correct, he seldom criticized "survivors" at all and his very positive comment on Abby Cohen and some star analysts, considering their nimble advice near the burst of the Internet Bubble, can be but anything close to the reality.
In a word, not worth the time. It wont help you at all not to be fooled by the next invesment fad, mania or bubble. Please pick those books I mentioned above instead.
Watch out for the road signs - they won't steer you wrong
CNBC anchor Ron Insana's "Trendwatching," his third examination of the stock market after "The Message of the Markets" in 2001 and "Traders' Tales" in 1996, should have been entitled "How not to lose your bundle the next time around." His stated purpose is to save the individual investor from him/her self during the next investment bubble that's sure to come. And he delivers his message loud and clear, whether it will be heeded or not. Throughout this work, Insana strains to point out that although bubbles occur, you do not have to be a victim; that with the historical knowledge he presents, you can arm yourself to go forth and do battle with market forces to survive and prosper through the bubbles' wild rides.This book is a revealing trip down investment-history lane and should be placed beside every investor's phone or electronic communications device as a reminder not to get caught up in the emotional mania that might be brewing right around the corner. He begins by defining what a bubble is, and borrowing strongly from Charles Kindleberger's (who died recently) "Manias, Panics, and Crashes," Insana traces bubbles starting from our most recent stock market debacle all the way back to Holland's Tulip Craze in the early 1600s. He finds that they all follow the Kindleberger (and Hyman Minsky) script: an invention or discovery sets off "a new era," then easy profits (speculation) fueled by easy credit or monetary conditions lead to the eventual parabolic blow off. Revulsion and recrimination set in as prices plunge back to earth. The insiders will have made out like bandits but the little guys get left holding a worthless bag of stocks. Reforms are instituted to correct the excesses. Then the stage gets set for the next bubble which will be of a different variety but of the same nature as the one before.The writing is crisp and the language is lucid. It's as interesting as it is educational. Where I would have wanted more insight concerns Insana's statement, "Bubbles, while useful in the building of transformational industries, are destructive when it comes to the financial well-being of the individual investor." That sounds like he's a bubble buster. Yet, he frequently references high-tech venture capitalist Robert McNamee who contends that without bubbles nothing is ever accomplished. So which is it? Can progress really happen without these manias in which we literally throw money at the "new, new thing" of Michael Lewis fame? Thinking along the lines much like the ongoing debate about what part adversity plays in human accomplishment, Insana raises the question of whether we can build new infrastructure without hurting the losers who invariably get in too late and stay in too long? The question remains to be answered.Another inquiry comes to mind while rummaging through the canal building, railroad building, automobile making, radio broadcasting...and Internet bubbles of the past couple hundred years: What part does politics play in the care and feeding of the "good times" so necessary for bubbles to form and spread. Did political elites of yesteryear encourage earlier bubbles? Although LBJ's Fed chairman, William McCesney Martin, said that the Fed's job was to "take away the punch bowl" just as the party gets started, would politicians sit idly by and watch the Fed (or some other monetary authority) squash a bubble, and with it the jobs and business conditions necessary for their (re)election? Well, we know George Bush did in the early 90s. But more recently, would Clinton have paid no mind to the Fed if it had begun raising stock margin requirements after Greenspan's famous December 1996 "Irrational Exuberance" speech? Did Clinton not learn something from the Republican sweep of Congress in 1994 after Greenspan goosed short term interest rates 100% earlier that year, and long term rates followed by rising 25%? Toward the end of the book, Insana ventures into the future by taking the precepts he has established for the creation of a bubble and plugs them into today's market. It isn't very difficult for him to make the case for hard assets being the next mania. Referring back to Kindleberger, he finds that just about all the ingredients necessary for a hard-asset bubble are in place: easy monetary policy, a weakening dollar, war, high oil prices, strong real estate demand, and an escalating gold price. The only thing missing to set off this bubble is the recognition of the presence of "inflation." When that gains currency in the media, then it's "everybody into the pool" and off we go again. Perhaps the true worth of this book is the graph on the last page - a picture of what Insana has been defining, chronicling, and warning against. Taken from The Bank Credit Analyst newsletter, it is a composite chart of the path all bubbles take. Just fit in whatever current mania is climbing skyward, and if it resembles this pattern...GET OUT! For Insana, that's the real payoff for keeping an eye on the trend.
If You Own Stock, Read This Book
While millions of Americans might feelbewildered by the confusion aroundthe market and turned off by muchof the media hype surrounding themarket, this book and its author arethe antitode.Ron Insana comes from the first tierof financial journalists who taketheir work seriously and provideperspective and insight that areuseful to anyone navigating reallife investments with real lifeconsquences for their financialsecurity. Lou Dobbs of CNN, NeilCavuto of Fox and Lou Rukeyser ofCNBC join Insana in this smallhigh quality circle of first ratemarket commentators and thinkers.This is a book about perspective andhistory. It is the history of megatrend market forces such as theTulip Mania from centuries ago andthe Japanese crisis that continuestoday, that Insana discusses andexplains. And its this historythat Insana reminds us offers theperspective so often missing today,a world of market bubbles andcrashes and scandals and confusion.Yes, they went crazy buying andselling Tulips and real estate atdifferent times in disparate partsof the world, just as they (we)went crazy buying and selling techstocks during the Nasdaq craze.As Insana reminds us, the marketevents we go through in our lifetimes,the good and the bad and theemotional frenzies up and down,are not unique to us. These kindsof megafrenzies have happened beforeand there is much we can learn fromhistory, to avoid mistakes thatseem to be repeatedly made, and tounderstand opportunities that maynot seem apparent in the heat ofthe moment and the emotionalism ofthe crisis.If you're disgusted with the marketand vow never to invest again, readthis book. And if you get thatcrazy feeling that you just haveto buy some stock today, thisminute, right now, you should alsoread this book. Because in the end,as is often said and as Insanareminds us well, those who learnfrom history are less likely torepeat its mistakes, and morelikely to prosper. In the meantimeread these true tales of marketmanias, remember that anything toogood to be true usually isn't,remember that fear and panic arenot the best ways to build financialsecurity. As you plan your financialfutures this book is invaluable byentertaining us, and reminding usof the obvious, which we so oftenforget.
